While Adam Liptak laments the fact that the Supreme Court's landmark Second Amendment ruling, District of Columbia v. Heller, has yet to stir the waters, NYT, "Few Ripples From Supreme Court Ruling On Guns, 3/16/09, a Spring 2009 Harvard Law and Policy law review article discussed and available at Doug Berman's Sentencing Blog, available here, provides food for thought for how Heller and emerging Second Amendment case law can be used to fashion novel and potentially meritorious Second Amendment arguments:
In 2004, domestic diva Martha Stewart was convicted of obstruction of justice, making false statements, and two counts of conspiracy in connection with dubious stock transactions. Although sentenced to only five months in jail plus a period of supervised release, she risked a much harsher punishment. Because she was convicted of a crime punishable by more than a year in prison, federal law bans her from having any gun. Her ban is for life, unless the Attorney General lifts the disability — a because Congress regularly bars the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives from spending any money to review petitions to lift firearms disabilities.
Is the public safer now that Martha Stewart is completely and permanently disarmed? More to the point, how could such a ban be constitutional, now that the Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v. Heller, not only has confirmed that the Second Amendment secures a personal right to keep and bear arms, but also has emphasized its historical tie to the right of self-defense?
* * *
Research and analysis need to replace dicta and assertions on this topic. Especially after Heller, there is much room for further thinking and discussion. Yet wherever the constitutional line may be, it is difficult to see the justification for the complete lifetime ban for all felons that federal law has imposed only since 1968. And among the various lines that the Second Amendment might draw, it is at least curious how Martha Stewart could merit anyone’s concern.
I'm intending to post sample post-Heller, Second Amendment argument pleadings here in the next several weeks. --John