In this Valdivia v. Brown, No. 94-671-LKK order, Judge Karlton held California's Proposition 9 to be unconstitutional because its changes to parole revocation procedures in California violate the minimum due process protections required by the Supreme Court's decisions in Morrisey v. Brewer and Gagnon v. Scarpelli. The ruling invalidates Prop 9 in its entirety, finding that when the unconstitutional provisions of the parole revocation statute are stricken, the remaining portions are not severable and "no portion of the statute can be preserved." Denny Walsh has a good summary in his article in today's Sacramento Bee.