Remember the Eric McDavid case? If not, here are all my posts on the case to get you up to speed.
In my last post on the case, I explained that, on July 30, the defense moved for an order to show cause asking the Court to order the government to explain how and why it withheld nearly 3,000 pages of documents bearing on Eric McDavid's entrapment defense until long after he was convicted and sentenced to 20 years -- including recently produced romantic correspondence between McDavid and the FBI's informant. The motion scheduled a hearing for September 3, 2015.
On August 20, the government filed this opposition with these exhibits responding that McDavid's settlement agreement barred him from requesting an explanation, and said it was even considering its available remedies for McDavid's potential "breach" of the plea agreement.
On August 27, the defense replied that the request did not violate the settlement agreement, and was "guided and protected by the most cherished principles of open government and accountability."
On September 2, the Court cancelled the hearing and instead issued this Order denying the defense motion, explaining that the request was barred by the plea agreement and was "moot because the Court has already conducted its own inquiry into that precise question." But see Sacramento Bee, 1/8/15 (quoting Judge England as saying at McDavid's release hearing that "This is something that needs to be dealt with, and I want to know what happened.").